ESPN’s Dan Orlovsky Racist View Shows In This Browns Shedeur Sanders vs Dillion Gabriel Comparison
ESPN’s Dan Orlovsky Racist View Shows In This Browns Shedeur Sanders vs Dillion Gabriel Comparison If you type "Dan Orlovsky Racist" in Google, you get the following: Multiple controversies involving ESPN analyst Dan Orlovsky have led to accusations of racism, particularly concerning his comments about Black quarterbacks . He has faced criticism on two main occasions. 2021 NFL Draft comments Before the 2021 NFL Draft, Orlovsky repeated an anonymous report that quarterback prospect Justin Fields, who is Black, had a poor work ethic. The accusation: Many observers, including other commentators, criticized Orlovsky for amplifying a long-running, racially coded narrative that has been used to unfairly discredit Black quarterback prospects. They noted that these stereotypes about intelligence and work ethic are rarely applied to white quarterbacks. Orlovsky's apology: Orlovsky later apologized on Twitter for amplifying the rumor without doing proper due diligence to vet the information. Wider context: The incident was widely viewed as an example of implicit racial bias in the NFL media, which has historically treated Black and white quarterbacks differently. 2024 "Black dudes" comment In an October 2024 episode of ESPN's First Take, Orlovsky was criticized for asking an insensitive and racially charged question during a discussion. The comment: While talking about scented candles, Orlovsky asked his Black co-hosts, "Do Black dudes have a scent? Is there a scent, like a different scent, that Black dudes have?" The question caused an awkward silence in the studio, and his co-hosts appeared shocked and uncomfortable. The reaction: The clip immediately went viral, and many on social media and sports blogs condemned the comment as bizarre, racist, and ignorant. Aftermath: Orlovsky did not face public discipline from ESPN for the remark, but the incident significantly added to the accusations of racial insensitivity leveled against him. So it's clear that ESPN’s Dan Orlovsky has an issue with black quarterbacks that points to racism. But for me the best example I just saw on ESPN last week. To put it simply, Dan Orlovsky took a play called for Dillion Gabriel that worked because it was a short-to-mid-range pass called against a three-man rush, and compared it to a play that did not work for Shedeur Sanders because it was a longer-range pass called against a five-man rush. But Dan Orlovsky make it sound like Shedeur Sanders could have made a pass to the wide receiver, when it's obvious to anyone Shedeur did not have the time to make the throw. Dan Orlovsky never asks why the Browns did not call short passes for Sanders, or bootleg plays. He blames Shedeur Sanders for how he handled a situation made bad by the Browns. Anyone would ask if the Browns were trying to do to Sanders what they did to Jameis Winston in throwing him in a high-risk passing game? If ESPN is making Dan Orlovsky do this, it's time to stop watching them.
via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX1Qkl71ssg
ESPN’s Dan Orlovsky Racist View Shows In This Browns Shedeur Sanders vs Dillion Gabriel Comparison If you type "Dan Orlovsky Racist" in Google, you get the following: Multiple controversies involving ESPN analyst Dan Orlovsky have led to accusations of racism, particularly concerning his comments about Black quarterbacks . He has faced criticism on two main occasions. 2021 NFL Draft comments Before the 2021 NFL Draft, Orlovsky repeated an anonymous report that quarterback prospect Justin Fields, who is Black, had a poor work ethic. The accusation: Many observers, including other commentators, criticized Orlovsky for amplifying a long-running, racially coded narrative that has been used to unfairly discredit Black quarterback prospects. They noted that these stereotypes about intelligence and work ethic are rarely applied to white quarterbacks. Orlovsky's apology: Orlovsky later apologized on Twitter for amplifying the rumor without doing proper due diligence to vet the information. Wider context: The incident was widely viewed as an example of implicit racial bias in the NFL media, which has historically treated Black and white quarterbacks differently. 2024 "Black dudes" comment In an October 2024 episode of ESPN's First Take, Orlovsky was criticized for asking an insensitive and racially charged question during a discussion. The comment: While talking about scented candles, Orlovsky asked his Black co-hosts, "Do Black dudes have a scent? Is there a scent, like a different scent, that Black dudes have?" The question caused an awkward silence in the studio, and his co-hosts appeared shocked and uncomfortable. The reaction: The clip immediately went viral, and many on social media and sports blogs condemned the comment as bizarre, racist, and ignorant. Aftermath: Orlovsky did not face public discipline from ESPN for the remark, but the incident significantly added to the accusations of racial insensitivity leveled against him. So it's clear that ESPN’s Dan Orlovsky has an issue with black quarterbacks that points to racism. But for me the best example I just saw on ESPN last week. To put it simply, Dan Orlovsky took a play called for Dillion Gabriel that worked because it was a short-to-mid-range pass called against a three-man rush, and compared it to a play that did not work for Shedeur Sanders because it was a longer-range pass called against a five-man rush. But Dan Orlovsky make it sound like Shedeur Sanders could have made a pass to the wide receiver, when it's obvious to anyone Shedeur did not have the time to make the throw. Dan Orlovsky never asks why the Browns did not call short passes for Sanders, or bootleg plays. He blames Shedeur Sanders for how he handled a situation made bad by the Browns. Anyone would ask if the Browns were trying to do to Sanders what they did to Jameis Winston in throwing him in a high-risk passing game? If ESPN is making Dan Orlovsky do this, it's time to stop watching them.
via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX1Qkl71ssg
Comments