Skip to main content

SF Chronicle Smears Deborah Edgerly, Claims She's Paid To Do Nothing



I just saw the SFGate online article about Oakland City Admininstrator Deborah Edgerly and it has the headline, "Paid to do nothing".

That's an insult and a smear, especially since the same article explains that Edgerly ran a meeting because Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums was late to attend it. The Chronicle's Chris Heredia wrote:

On Friday, Dellums asked all city department heads to report directly to him until further notice. Edgerly, however, ran the first half of a weekly meeting of city department heads on Monday when Dellums was running late.


So that means she's not paid to do nothing -- she's doing something. But most SFGate readers will just see that stupid headline and then make dumb comments in the comments section. Then they will communicate that to others and the public will have the wrong view of Miss E.

Look, I don't think the SF Chronicle should do that. It's not right and it's certainly a smear of the first order.

Comments

Colin said…
Sorry, but you're wrong. Currently, she's not being paid to do anything, as the headline states. That she did something is irrelevant - she's in a staff position and has no authority. She is an inverted limbo, where she has no responsibilities but is getting paid. Curiously, so is her nephew.

You're grasping at straws here, cherrypicking to defend your friend. I find it confusing, and a little bit troubling. I have to ask: what were your dealings with her in the past? Did she do something to benefit you when you were both in the city government? Was she helpful in showing you the ropes? Was she instrumental in getting you your job? I don't want to imply that she did anything illegal in helping you because I don't have any basis to believe that, but I do get the impression that your defense of her is rooted more in a personal relationship than in her record. I'd be interested in hearing more about that.

I look forward to your detailed analysis of how she's been discriminated against by the city, in spite of being the highest-ranking member of our city's bureaucracy. You suggested this was forthcoming and that you could back it up.

You also suggested you were going to write a post about how anyone would do what she has done. I look forward to that, as well. From my perspective, the more I learn the less defensible she becomes, so I'm interested in someone doing so.

Meanwhile, I'm left with a picture of someone who is the very model of corruption. I would refer you to the other column about Ms. Edgerly on sfgate:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/24/BAV811DSGR.DTL
In which Chip Johnson outlines a truly disturbing history of nepotism and corruption, all centered on Ms Edgerly's office.
Zennie said…
Colin, your reponse is grating to anyone who knows what public management is all about. Showing up to work and presiding over meetings IS WORK. WHY IN HELL .... Sorry. It's just that you should know these things; others do.

The SF Chronicle was being insulting and it was a smear. You followed true to form by believing what was written and trying to form a rationale behind it that's at best flimsy. Miss E was working.

As to what she's done for me, the only thing that she's done is to listen to me when few others would do so. Plus, she acted on my Coliseum - related requests and respected my position as aide to the Mayor. That's enough, and that was way back in the late 90s. But I remember.

As to recently, we were both at the Coliseum Box three years ago and she barely talked to me. I thought that was really weird but I didn't not hold it as a grudge.

Imagine if I did.
Colin said…
Grating? Please reread. She is currently being paid, but she has no authority. From the article:

For now, Edgerly works as a paid city employee with no decision-making authority

That she is conducting meetings and doing work without any authority is beside the point. By any measure, I currently have as much authority to run those meetings as she does.

But yeah - hey - sure. She's "doing things." And it pisses me off. Why she hasn't been formally suspended I cannot for the life of me imagine, but that's par for this sad course I guess.

Regardless: you're picking an extremely minor and debatable point where there are much, much bigger issues at hand.

It seems like you're struggling to find ways to defend her, and I'd like to see something more substantive.
Zennie said…
I read the damn article. It's a smear job. And look, the person who wrote it got it wrong. She's got enough authority to decide what freaking questions to ask at a meeting, and the proof of that is in the stupid work.

You're reacting with prejudice, so it would take an 18-wheeler hooked up to a giant drill to insert common logic into you.

It's called M-A-N-A-G-E-M-E-N-T

That's what she's being paid for and to do. It's called oversight -- she's still doing that.
Colin said…
Wow. Thanks for the cheap insult. I guess I understand why nobody bothers to comment on this blog.

If you seriously believe that I am viewing this with prejudice, you ought to look at yourself.

You refer to her as "Ms E", brag about your friendship with her since 1993, and say you've never known her to do anything but play by the book. In ignoring sigificant evidence to the contrary, you put your prejudice right up front.

You personally emailed me to tell me that she wasn't corrupt in forcing the city to engage in nepotism, and implied that I would do the same. You told me that she has been the victim of discrimination in the city government. That is a declaration of your prejudice, and you have as of yet to offer anything to back it up (still waiting on those posts).

Prejudice? Please. My opinions are based on the facts that I know, but I openly acknowledge that they may be incomplete. Your opinions seem to be based solely on warm feelings you have for this woman and exist in spite of facts. One is the definition of prejudice, one is not. If you honestly believe that things are just fine in her office you're delusional.


But there's not much point in arguing with you, and I think my point's pretty clear. Until such time as you actually post anything to back up your high opinion of her, I'll stick my own.
Tired of Smears said…
Zennie, there's no use in even responding to Colin. Anyone who reads an article and takes it for "gospel", simply because it's in print, has the brain size of an ant. Chip Johnson's article is like you said, filled with smears AND inaccurate information. It's amazing how the media and nimwit readers/bloggers like Colin, have already convicted Ms. Edgerly when the facts are still being gathered. She has been dedicated and given so much to the City in the way of time and knowledge. I challenge anyone to say that they put in more hours in the office than she does (we know the Mayor, City Attorney and Council certainly can't say that). She deserves every penny and more, of her salary. Despite your illusions of grandeur Colin, you couldn't do Ms. E's job even WITHOUT some of her authority being removed. Heck, you can't even think for yourself unless it's written in print by a "journalist" (I use that term loosely), so I certainly don't want you running anything.
Zennie said…
"Tired of Smear" speaks, er, "writes" for me.

Popular posts from this blog

Alex Castro, Electronic Arts VP, Is Oakland’s “Fake Joe Tuman”, “Crocker Mom”

Alex Castro, is currently Vice President Of Product Management At Electronic Arts, and a fairly-well-known and legendary tech executive, regularly quoted in a number of industry publications. But Alex Castro’s also an Oakland resident who has the terrible habit of going online, making traceble email accounts from his Electronic Arts office, and posing as someone […] from WordPress http://ift.tt/1fVkWP9 via IFTTT

Event: Jog For Jill San Francisco Run September 12th Golden Gate Park

Cal Women's Rowing Team member Jill Costello passed away from complications due to lung cancer on June 24th 2010 and at the age of 21. A San Francisco event and run called Jog For Jill has been established and will be held this Sunday, September 12th at 5 PM. Two members of the Cal Women's Crew team were at the Cal vs. Davis football game wearing Jog For Jill shirts, and were kind enough to provide the video interview above. Below are the other details from the event website, where you're encouraged to pre-register here CLICK FOR SITE : Pre-Registration: Online/$25 Day of Registration: 4:00 p.m./$30 Shotgun Start: 5:00 p.m. After run/walk celebration: 6:00 p.m.- 8:30 p.m. Event Location: Golden Gate Park Music Concourse Bandshell S Tea Garden Drive San Francisco, California 94118 Participants are encouraged to pre-register. Only pre-registered participants will be guaranteed a walk/run T-shirt. T-shirts will be limited to the first 2500 day of regis

Oakland Mayor's Race: LWV Forum Draws Oakland's Older Folks

Oakland Mayor's Race Forum first take. (Which means, there's going to be more of these posts on last night, because a lot was happening.) This just in: The Oakland Tribune's out of touch with Oakland. A number of attendees of the 450 estimated said they learned of the Oakland League Of Women Voters via "the newspaper." All of the people who made that statement were over 50 years old. Still, the forum, which attracted every candidate except Dr. Terrance Candell, was a success. The auditorium at 300 Lakeside Drive seats 380 people, so if you do the math, it was about 70 over capacity. The crowd was a happy mix of supporters of candidates and long-time observers of the Oakland political scene. The one complaint they had was there wasn't enough time to hear what the candidates were about. That wasn't because there were too many candidates, but due to the format. Either Oakland Tribune Editor Martin Reynolds or the League of Women Voter