The interesting news of litigation between the Oakland Coliseum and the Golden State Warriors mentioned in my last blog post just became more interesting. It was hard to get any good intel from what has been a closed-session conversation as of Apr 15, 2011. And one document that was, at one point on the Coliseum's website and referring to this legal battle, was interestingly removed.
But some light emerged at the website of Keker &Van Nest, and one lawyer named Daniel Purcell, who claims:
And I put that in image form, in case Mr. Purcell was urged to take down the text by his client (and the same text appears on the profiles of three other Keker lawyers too). It's here now.
So the Coliseum got $32.25 million from the Warriors? What was it used for? What was the problem to start with?
Thanks to Keker's lawyers, we have some new information not noted anywhere else online, at least thus far.
Stay tuned.
But some light emerged at the website of Keker &Van Nest, and one lawyer named Daniel Purcell, who claims:
Golden State Warriors v. Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum: We represented the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority in a series of disputes with the coliseum's professional basketball team. These disputes, involving tens of millions of dollars, arose over more than ten years and involved miscellaneous claims and cross-claims. Over the course of four arbitrations, we collected $32.25 million for our client.
So the Coliseum got $32.25 million from the Warriors? What was it used for? What was the problem to start with?
Thanks to Keker's lawyers, we have some new information not noted anywhere else online, at least thus far.
Stay tuned.
Comments