City Of Oakland Lawsuit vs NFL And Oakland Raiders Survives ZOOM Hearing; Dismiss Motion Not Dead - Video
City Of Oakland Lawsuit vs NFL And Oakland Raiders Survives ZOOM Hearing; Dismiss Motion Not Dead The "motion to dismiss" the City of Oakland lawsuit against the Oakland Raiders for alleged anti-trust violations and lack of good faith actions failed to derail the lawsuit, but the motion is still alive. Judge Joseph C. Spero asked Raiders and NFL lawyer Daniel B. Asimow of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP to provide a better definition of "diversity" with respect to the market for teams to enter and exit the National Football League. Bruce Simon, representing the City of Oakland and of Pearson Simon & Warshaw, LLP, thanked Judge Spero for allowing them to enter more information into their argument. But, the way it started out was such that one would come away with the idea that Spero just wanted to accept the motion to dismiss and get rid of the case, regardless of the argument. Indeed, James Quinn, also representing the City of Oakland, made such a statement; the remark seemed to set in motion a different direction toward today's outcome. In the vlog, I discuss the case hearing in more detail and lay out additional issues that will be expanded upon. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/iivcaaQOcU0
City Of Oakland Lawsuit vs NFL And Oakland Raiders Survives ZOOM Hearing; Dismiss Motion Not Dead The "motion to dismiss" the City of Oakland lawsuit against the Oakland Raiders for alleged anti-trust violations and lack of good faith actions failed to derail the lawsuit, but the motion is still alive. Judge Joseph C. Spero asked Raiders and NFL lawyer Daniel B. Asimow of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP to provide a better definition of "diversity" with respect to the market for teams to enter and exit the National Football League. Bruce Simon, representing the City of Oakland and of Pearson Simon & Warshaw, LLP, thanked Judge Spero for allowing them to enter more information into their argument. But, the way it started out was such that one would come away with the idea that Spero just wanted to accept the motion to dismiss and get rid of the case, regardless of the argument. Indeed, James Quinn, also representing the City of Oakland, made such a statement; the remark seemed to set in motion a different direction toward today's outcome. In the vlog, I discuss the case hearing in more detail and lay out additional issues that will be expanded upon. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/iivcaaQOcU0
Comments