Skip to main content

Oakland A's Never Said Las Vegas Ballpark Needed To Sellout To Pencil-Out, Bad Journalists Did

Oakland A's Never Said Las Vegas Ballpark Needed To Sellout To Pencil-Out, Bad Journalists Did
It's sad that in sports in America, an unpopular team relocation decision automatically leads to bad journalism, but that's the case with the Oakland Athletics' plan to build a $1.5 billion ballpark in Las Vegas, and on land currently occupied by the Tropicana Hotel. The Oakland A's recently announced that the ballpark is expected to draw 2.5 million visitors. The whole mess started with Bally's press release, which read, in part, “The ballpark is expected to welcome more than 2.5 million fans and visitors annually, and will be a one-of-a-kind asset for the Las Vegas Strip” and “The new ballpark will accommodate approximately 30,000 fans.” No where in the press release did Bally's say that the proposed ballpark would need 30,000 fans for the bond issue to be paid. Journalists (most notably with the L.A. Times) unthinkingly hopped on that “2.5 million fans “ number to assume that it meant the A's were saying each game would draw over 30,000 visitors, and that each person would have a seat. In point of fact, neither Bally's nor the A's said that. Given that Bally's announced its intention to attract other developer partners, writing “Bally's retains the ability to assign the rights to all aspects of this development and has received material interest from development partners”, it's fair to assume that there will be a standing-room-only ticket sales provision, the better to assure that patrons flow from ballpark to other land uses in the sports and entertainment district. The trouble is, folks who call themselves journalists, didn't stop to think about the ballpark from the perspective of a stadium developer, let alone ask questions that would reflect a stadium developer's perspective. Indeed, this entire affair reveals that the modern journalist is really a blogger absent the number one rule of Blogger's Ethics: always state your biases and never fein objectivity. So, the biased journalist trots out my friend, Stanford Profesor Roger Noll, who's a really heck of a nice man, but has a terrible bias that comes into his work in evaluating the economic performance of stadium proposals. We know each other from my days as Founder and CEO of Sports Business Simulations, where I created the Oakland Baseball Simworld game for the classroom. Anyway, Roger did the unthinking thing, where he forgot that the stadium's part of a larger development project, and assumed that the A's were projecting that each ticket sold was for a seat, rather than SRO and seating. In other words, Professor Noll tried to assume something wrong with the proposal, rather that follow its land use layout to its logical conclusion that bears repeating: the ballpark is part of a sports and entertainment complex where visitors can watch baseball and do other things, all in one visit. Call it a compact version of what Oakland Coliseum City is supposed to be, just in Las Vegas. And as for the numbers Bally's put out, Roger was clearly missing the real news: that the projected tax revenues would be enough to pay off the $120 million bond issue in 5 years, even though the debt service is spread over 30 years. Assuming an interest rate of 6 percent, the debt service over 30 years totals $261,536,081, or $8,717,869, annually. Meanwhile the expected tax revenue is $38.8 million from one-time construction, $17 million annually, and $36.5 million, annually from “incremental visitation”, totals $92.3 million in year one, and then $53.5 million each year, thereafter. So, over a four year period, that totals $306 million, or a difference of a positive $44.764 million, and that's leaving another 25 years of tax revenue collection for the bond. So, it's quite clear that just taking a little time to crunch the numbers reveals that the ballpark complex does pay for itself. If journalists of today acted like objective operators they claim to be, perhaps we'd get a real, honest look at stadium proposals, Stay tuned.

via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goDXSTqo2pQ

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alex Castro, Electronic Arts VP, Is Oakland’s “Fake Joe Tuman”, “Crocker Mom”

Alex Castro, is currently Vice President Of Product Management At Electronic Arts, and a fairly-well-known and legendary tech executive, regularly quoted in a number of industry publications. But Alex Castro’s also an Oakland resident who has the terrible habit of going online, making traceble email accounts from his Electronic Arts office, and posing as someone […] from WordPress http://ift.tt/1fVkWP9 via IFTTT

Event: Jog For Jill San Francisco Run September 12th Golden Gate Park

Cal Women's Rowing Team member Jill Costello passed away from complications due to lung cancer on June 24th 2010 and at the age of 21. A San Francisco event and run called Jog For Jill has been established and will be held this Sunday, September 12th at 5 PM. Two members of the Cal Women's Crew team were at the Cal vs. Davis football game wearing Jog For Jill shirts, and were kind enough to provide the video interview above. Below are the other details from the event website, where you're encouraged to pre-register here CLICK FOR SITE : Pre-Registration: Online/$25 Day of Registration: 4:00 p.m./$30 Shotgun Start: 5:00 p.m. After run/walk celebration: 6:00 p.m.- 8:30 p.m. Event Location: Golden Gate Park Music Concourse Bandshell S Tea Garden Drive San Francisco, California 94118 Participants are encouraged to pre-register. Only pre-registered participants will be guaranteed a walk/run T-shirt. T-shirts will be limited to the first 2500 day of regis

Oakland Mayor's Race: LWV Forum Draws Oakland's Older Folks

Oakland Mayor's Race Forum first take. (Which means, there's going to be more of these posts on last night, because a lot was happening.) This just in: The Oakland Tribune's out of touch with Oakland. A number of attendees of the 450 estimated said they learned of the Oakland League Of Women Voters via "the newspaper." All of the people who made that statement were over 50 years old. Still, the forum, which attracted every candidate except Dr. Terrance Candell, was a success. The auditorium at 300 Lakeside Drive seats 380 people, so if you do the math, it was about 70 over capacity. The crowd was a happy mix of supporters of candidates and long-time observers of the Oakland political scene. The one complaint they had was there wasn't enough time to hear what the candidates were about. That wasn't because there were too many candidates, but due to the format. Either Oakland Tribune Editor Martin Reynolds or the League of Women Voter